[fblike]
Today’s R&D covers the impending Congressional vote on whether to authorize President Obama to launch limited military action against the Syrian government.
Congress rejecting Barack Obama’s case for a limited attack on Syria would not set a dangerous precedent http://t.co/p9n5wdi59M
— The Economist (@TheEconomist) September 4, 2013
The Syria vote’s political stakes http://t.co/D7JApuPBFh
— L.A. Times Opinion (@latimesopinion) September 4, 2013
New on politics from #HuffPo: Syria Vote Poses Test For GOP’s Conflicting Visions http://t.co/pOHXh38tt4
— Terry Bean (@TBeanPolitics) September 4, 2013
A U.N. vote is not optional on Syria. Op-Ed: http://t.co/ptTxw2WDCL
— NYT Opinion (@nytopinion) September 4, 2013
Kevin McCarthy, No. 3 in the House GOP, is undecided on Syria, which puts him at odds with @johnboehner & @EricCantor http://t.co/kiCyuRM3C6
— POLITICO (@politico) September 4, 2013
Kerry can’t see it, but Congress may vote ‘No’ on Syria http://t.co/AeAzH1MOCU (By @GeneHealy)
— Cato Institute (@CatoInstitute) September 3, 2013
Graham: If we lost a vote in Congress dealing w/ chemical weapons in #Syria, what effect would that have on Iran? http://t.co/QDQMbrPFue
— Roll Call (@rollcall) September 2, 2013
Editorial: Britain’s solidarity with American foreign policy has never been automatic, nor should it be. http://t.co/Nq5ROUM9rH
— NYT Opinion (@nytopinion) September 4, 2013
Analysis: Obama lobbies personally for Syria vote http://t.co/KeGLzFznrF
— Reuters Top News (@Reuters) September 2, 2013
Huge Progressive Group Plans To Pressure Congressional Democrats To Oppose Action In Syria http://t.co/SMtHOosbC2
— Business Insider (@businessinsider) September 4, 2013